Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> So the problem is: If you have a split that you're using both for POP3
> and IMAP, then POP3 one needs a default split, while the IMAP shouldn't
> have one.
>
> Gnus deals with this by special-casing the IMAP case.  It simply ignores
> "" (catch-all) rules.
>
> We could deal with this by:
>
> 1) Just document that IMAP client-side splits ignores the catch-all
> rule.
>
> 2) Something else.  Ideas are welcome.

Couldn't you say that catch-all rules are followed if they exist on
IMAP? (And if there isn't one, stuff is left in INBOX, as you described)
I don't understand why this doesn't make sense...

Rupert