From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/46427
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Splitting on mail contents?  (using spam-stat.el)
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 19:17:03 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <ilu1y8567ow.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
References: <03bs7em0a4.fsf@msgid.viggen.net>
	<vafwuq1voq2.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<03y9ahlu15.fsf@msgid.viggen.net>
	<vafheh5vm4k.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<87sn0nnmeg.fsf@emacswiki.org> <87sn0mj83a.fsf@emacswiki.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031419266 9317 127.0.0.1 (7 Sep 2002 17:21:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 17:21:06 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17njGX-0002PN-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Sat, 07 Sep 2002 19:21:01 +0200
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 17njD9-0004It-00; Sat, 07 Sep 2002 12:17:31 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 07 Sep 2002 12:18:06 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA04524
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 12:17:54 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 4111 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2002 17:17:13 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 4106 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2002 17:17:12 -0000
Original-Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net (HELO yxa.extundo.com) (217.13.230.178)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2002 17:17:12 -0000
Original-Received: from latte.josefsson.org (yxa.extundo.com [217.13.230.178])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g87HH6n3029420
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
	Sat, 7 Sep 2002 19:17:08 +0200
Original-To: Alex Schroeder <alex@emacswiki.org>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Hashcash: 0:020907:alex@emacswiki.org:0226b62351f413b2
X-Hashcash: 0:020907:ding@gnus.org:08dc5d5e11761319
In-Reply-To: <87sn0mj83a.fsf@emacswiki.org> (Alex Schroeder's message of
 "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 14:30:01 +0200")
Original-Lines: 11
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46427
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46427

Alex Schroeder <alex@emacswiki.org> writes:

> Now what would be the correct way of dealing with this problem?  Would
> to real solution not be to change Gnus such that only one buffer is
> used, and advertize it in the manual?

Yes.  The buffer name should probably be stored in a variable.  Only
problem would be that people are already using the two hard coded
buffer names... having two variables and keeping the two buffer names
seems like a possibility but perhaps it is not that important?  Having
one buffer name would be better.