From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/41794
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Checking new mail very slow with current CVS
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 18:42:38 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <ilu1ygzpgj5.fsf@extundo.com>
References: <yl666vokv7.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
	<iluelljl8ux.fsf@extundo.com> <ylvgev6jjr.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
	<ilupu52ki81.fsf@extundo.com> <ylelli7qyf.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
	<iluofkmhyq6.fsf@extundo.com> <ylsn9xrnbh.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
	<iluitask79l.fsf@extundo.com> <krause.87pu4jlae2.fsf@sdbk.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035177135 7999 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 05:12:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 05:12:15 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: (qmail 22662 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2002 17:45:56 -0000
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13)
  by mastaler.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2002 17:45:56 -0000
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 16OMmE-0003wE-00; Wed, 09 Jan 2002 11:44:38 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 09 Jan 2002 11:44:29 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA17099
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 11:44:18 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 22623 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2002 17:44:21 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 22618 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2002 17:44:21 -0000
Original-Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net (HELO yxa.extundo.com) (217.13.230.178)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 9 Jan 2002 17:44:21 -0000
Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain ([195.42.214.241])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g09Hi1lu008196;
	Wed, 9 Jan 2002 18:44:08 +0100
Original-To: Sebastian Krause <krause@sdbk.de>
In-Reply-To: <krause.87pu4jlae2.fsf@sdbk.de> (Sebastian Krause's message of
 "Wed, 09 Jan 2002 18:08:53 +0100")
Original-Lines: 16
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) Emacs/21.1.50
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:41794
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:41794

Sebastian Krause <krause@sdbk.de> writes:

>> Thank you.  FWIW, I can reproduce this.  Gnus 5.9.0 from Emacs 21 is
>> faster than Oort Gnus 0.0.4 (8 seconds vs 12 seconds for me).  The
>> following speed things up, but I don't think everything can be blamed
>> on this.  Does it have any effect for you?
>
> I had the same problem with the current CVS and your patch solved my
> problem that Gnus takes a long time when I hit 'g' in the Group
> buffer. Could anyone please patch the current CVS with Simon's
> following patch, it seems to me that this solution isn't in the CVS
> yet, because i still had the problem with the current Oort Gnus from
> a few hours ago.

I'm not sure the change is The Right Thing.  It seems as if it is
related to the nntp.el overhaul -- Didier?