From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36587
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Imap Problem
Date: 05 Jun 2001 20:19:32 +0200
Message-ID: <ilu1yoypz63.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
References: <76y9rdaxai.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com>
	<ypklmncn0qu.fsf@spip.netinsight.se>
	<76zobsxrkj.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com>
	<ypk4ru0w6c2.fsf@spip.netinsight.se>
	<iluu21zol4o.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
	<m3zobqzm2a.fsf@c213.89.177.36.cm-upc.chello.se>
	<ilu1yp24mpb.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
	<76n17o9q1k.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172147 9349 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:49:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:49:07 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <jas@extundo.com>
Return-Path: <jas@extundo.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 7907 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2001 18:18:42 -0000
Original-Received: from dolk.extundo.com (195.42.214.242)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2001 18:18:42 -0000
Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (slipsten.extundo.com [195.42.214.241])
	(authenticated)
	by dolk.extundo.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f55IImq29958;
	Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:18:49 +0200
Original-To: Jake Colman <colman@ppllc.com>
In-Reply-To: <76n17o9q1k.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> (Jake Colman's message of "04 Jun 2001 12:18:47 -0400")
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor)
Original-Lines: 16
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36587
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36587

Jake Colman <colman@ppllc.com> writes:

> I went back to my prior version of pgnus, prior to Simon's commits, and
> manually applied on my Matt's one line change to imap.el.  With this patch
> applied, I cannot start gnus in its own frame.  if I do, the password
> prompting is messed up and it eats my CR instead of processing the password.
> So this problem is specifically related to Matt's portion of the patch and
> was not caused by whatever else Simon patched.

Does the problem also disappear if you remove the patch?  (Just to
single out any other factors.)

I suspect something else is wrong, maybe a `read-passwd' bug, since
the password has always been read from within the process buffer, and
adding an extra `set-buffer' to change to that buffer shouldn't harm
anything.  (Famous last words.)