From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35717 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Crypto-MIME in GNUS Date: 10 Apr 2001 12:50:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171414 4570 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:36:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 25056 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2001 12:49:54 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 25051 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2001 12:49:54 -0000 Original-Received: from dolk.extundo.com (195.42.214.242) by gnus.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2001 12:49:54 -0000 Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (slipsten.extundo.com [195.42.214.241]) (authenticated) by dolk.extundo.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3ACorj17769; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:50:55 +0200 Original-To: "Georg C. F. Greve" In-Reply-To: ("Georg C. F. Greve"'s message of "10 Apr 2001 10:52:56 +0200") Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/21.0.102 Original-Lines: 29 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35717 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35717 "Georg C. F. Greve" writes: > The biggest problem was that the gnus crypto function didn't work > since it gave mailcrypt the buffer to encrypt that didn't contain > headers so mailcrypt had no way to determine who to encrypt it > for. Weird, this is definitely not the case for me. Could you tell why `message-options-set-recipient' function fail to figure out recipients? Or if there's some problem in mml2015 when mailcrypt is given the information snarfed from the *mail* buffer? > Also when I got it to work half-way I realized that CC and BCC > were ignored. Right, `message-options-set-recipient' only look at the To: header. > Also I wanted a nice way to determine whether to encrypt or sign that > I could toggle while composing the mail. Hm, `C-c RET s p' or `C-c RET c p'? > What is also nice is an easy way to include public keys into the mail > with correct MIME type. The solution I have is ugly but I didn't have > time to think about something better and for now it works. Ah, this is really useful. Is there a MIME type for pgp public keys? Cool. I'm still using the mailcrypt default bindings which gets me a nice menu where I can choice to insert my public key as a block.