From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/31905
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: No Cc on wide reply
Date: 24 Jul 2000 11:22:23 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <ilu3dkzyjao.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org.d.dynas.se>
References: <m2d7k6rehe.fsf@reader.ptw.com>
	<vafu2di8j84.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m2n1jap9er.fsf@reader.ptw.com> <m3bszq4617.fsf@peorth.rgo.gweep.net>
	<vafzon918rs.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3lmysanaz.fsf@peorth.rgo.gweep.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168263 16732 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:44:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:44:23 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "(ding)" <ding@gnus.org>
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A019D051E
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 05:23:19 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAC08294;
	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 04:23:10 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 24 Jul 2000 04:22:15 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA10368
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 04:21:52 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from vic20.blipp.com (unknown [195.84.94.187])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90453D051E
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 05:22:19 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org.d.dynas.se (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by vic20.blipp.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e6O9MG621291;
	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:22:16 +0200
Original-To: Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net>
In-Reply-To: Stainless Steel Rat's message of "23 Jul 2000 11:17:24 -0400"
Mail-Copies-To: never
Original-Lines: 15
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Carlsbad Caverns)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31905
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31905

Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net> writes:

> | I think the header might be useful in a posting to a mailing list.
> | Maybe the author doesn't want to receive two copies of the replies,
> | and is subscribed to the mailing list.
> 
> Reply-To is used in a mail message to direct replies to someone other than
> the originator.  Using Mail-Copies-To to duplicate this behavior is
> redundant.

Reply-To is not used when I do "followup", but Mail-Copies-To is. (But
I admit it's questionable if it should.)

What would the mail headers look that achieve the same thing as my
"Mail-Copies-To: never" in this mail look like?