From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38497 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Docs on S/MIME and GPG with Oort ? Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 22:35:00 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174350 22721 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:25:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 20349 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2001 20:35:43 -0000 Original-Received: from dolk.extundo.com (195.42.214.242) by gnus.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2001 20:35:43 -0000 Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (slipsten.extundo.com [195.42.214.241]) (authenticated) by dolk.extundo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f81KZnh26205; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 22:35:50 +0200 Original-To: Vincent Bernat In-Reply-To: (Vincent Bernat's message of "Sat, 01 Sep 2001 19:42:53 +0200") Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105 Original-Lines: 27 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38497 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38497 Vincent Bernat writes: > Hello ! > > Is there some docs on GPG and S/MIME with Oort only (and not > mailcrypt) ? Some kinds of tutorial since the manual is very short on > this subject. Did you see the Security node in the Message documentation? > I am using the very latest CVS of Oort. I can encrypt and decrypt > without problems, however, I cannot verify GPG and S/MIME sig. For > S/MIME, I don't know what I need. You need to configure `smime-CA-directory', and populate the directory with CA's you trust. See the OpenSSL smime(1) manpage for details on the latter (maybe this step should be documented better, or made easier). > In fact, I don't have any feedback about the presence of a signature > in the message : no bracketed status about the presence of a > signature, no bracketed status about the result of the check of a > signature. I can "detect" that a message have a signature because it > is a multipart message. You don't see any brackets indicating it is a PGP signed mail? Could you forward a sample?