From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36283 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: more on accessing the body via split rules... Date: 19 May 2001 10:58:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87r8xmg02v.fsf@mclinux.com> <87d796d5xw.fsf@mclinux.com> <878zjud3cs.fsf@mclinux.com> <87wv7e7acu.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171894 7747 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:44:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 6032 invoked by alias); 19 May 2001 09:46:50 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 6027 invoked from network); 19 May 2001 09:46:50 -0000 Original-Received: from dolk.extundo.com (195.42.214.242) by gnus.org with SMTP; 19 May 2001 09:46:50 -0000 Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (slipsten.extundo.com [195.42.214.241]) (authenticated) by dolk.extundo.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4J8wdq28812; Sat, 19 May 2001 10:58:39 +0200 Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "19 May 2001 00:43:14 +0200") Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.103 Original-Lines: 14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36283 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36283 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes: > > Yes, g-o-a-b is definitely wrong. How about this? > > Close, but Josh says that respooling uses the > gnus-original-article-buffer. Does that also need changing? I don't think so, respooling are Gnus summary buffer commands, and they uses the same functions for retrieving articles as the displaying commands does. Nn* on the other hand shouldn't know about Gnus internals, and in theory should even be possible to use without Gnus (but that is not really tested, I think). Hm, how is this a problem? Doesn't nnmail copy the article into nnmail-incoming-buffer before processing it, even when respooling?