From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32301 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnml -> nnimap (preserving Xrefs) Date: 01 Sep 2000 12:58:46 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <52em3770ov.fsf@sean.ebone.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168594 18942 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:49:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F2AD051E for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 06:57:29 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAC16458; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 05:57:12 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 01 Sep 2000 05:56:28 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA17711 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 05:56:19 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from vic20.blipp.com (unknown [195.163.165.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FD5D051E for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 06:56:43 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org.d.dynas.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vic20.blipp.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e81AuW917547; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 12:56:32 +0200 Original-To: Steinar Bang In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32301 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32301 Steinar Bang writes: > > It doesn't. IMAP doesn't support the concept of cross-posting. > > Right now, the article is simply copied into all mailboxes. And > > until more servers support the ANNOTATE draft, there's no way we can > > attach any (such as a Xref header) information on the article. > > Hm... does the annotate draft open for replacements of headers? Or > does it only allow insertion of new ones? (I'm thinking of > re-parenting of articles) It does have a field to replace the "subject" line. I brought up the idea of replacing that with a flexible scheme, to modify any header as per user wishes. I don't recollect the arguments, but noone seemed to rejoice over the suggestion. The draft allow for vendor specific stuff though. When I install a server that support annotations and get some time to play with it, I'll add a vendor specific way for reparenting. There's another draft to do threading on the server. It doesn't look like it ever will support user re-parenting though. :-/