From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/61251 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta Subject: Re: Speed difference in Gnus Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:27:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87r7ap899o.fsf@xemacs.org> <434EFD44.7030601@xemacs.org> <877jcgub0f.fsf@xemacs.org> <434F3897.3050007@xemacs.org> <873bn4tptq.fsf@xemacs.org> <87d5m89wuf.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87y84nyuo0.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <873bmulscb.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87pspypwzv.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87fyqqdfhq.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <85zmoy22o5.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87ll0ihqn1.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87ek697ag9.fsf@Jesper-Harders-Computer.local> <85oe5dqmhi.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <8764rkr5cp.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <4360272D.8080008@xemacs.org> <878xwex91z.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87u0f1zwht.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130502678 26629 80.91.229.2 (28 Oct 2005 12:31:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org, ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m9782@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Oct 28 14:31:16 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVTLK-00045H-Hp for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:28:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EVTLG-0000UC-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:28:18 -0500 Original-Received: from nas02.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.40]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EVTKg-0000U7-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:27:42 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas02.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EVTKc-0006WK-2h for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:27:42 -0500 Original-Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net ([217.13.230.178] helo=yxa.extundo.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EVTKW-0000ro-00 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:27:32 +0200 Original-Received: from latte.josefsson.org (c494102a.s-bi.bostream.se [217.215.27.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by yxa.extundo.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j9SCRPCj023531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:27:26 +0200 Original-To: Uwe Brauer OpenPGP: id=B565716F; url=http://josefsson.org/key.txt X-Hashcash: 1:21:051028:oub@mat.ucm.es::0w5qO1zDPsZEQn6p:5ww/ X-Hashcash: 1:21:051028:xemacs-beta@xemacs.org::AR5LcdZJ1zgXhaH9:3QVH X-Hashcash: 1:21:051028:ding@gnus.org::+SmkLQ2yQeK8G4xC:BtHK In-Reply-To: <87u0f1zwht.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:55:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on yxa-iv X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84, clamav-milter version 0.84e on yxa.extundo.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61251 gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta:20935 Archived-At: Uwe Brauer writes: >>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Josefsson writes: > > Simon> Uwe Brauer writes: > > Simon> Kill the buffer " *nnimap *ucimap.ucm.es" (note leading SPC). > > >> If someone could suggest me how to enhance the testing in order to > >> localise the problem... > > Simon> Instrument imap* and nnimap* for ELP. Note that nnimap is > I did elp-instrument-package gnus (which I thought include everyting) No, the (nn)imap functions in Gnus doesn't use the gnus function name prefix, you need to instrument them manually. Same for message, mm, pgg, sieve etc. > Simon> likely to be slowed than nnml, but I'm not sure what > Simon> magnitude of "slower" you are talking about here. > > Get stacked, I mean not doing anything (xemacs) compared to perform a > operation (gnu emacs) Aha. Ok. That's bad.