From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/31859 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Courier IMAP, nnimap and large UIDs Date: 19 Jul 2000 18:42:35 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168222 16448 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:43:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57558D051E for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 12:42:55 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAC25605; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 11:42:39 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 19 Jul 2000 11:41:31 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA22650 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 11:41:14 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from vic20.blipp.com (unknown [195.84.94.187]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0184FD051E for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 12:41:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vic20.blipp.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e6JGfk621033; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:41:46 +0200 Original-To: Steve Harris In-Reply-To: Steve Harris's message of "19 Jul 2000 08:44:23 -0700" Mail-Copies-To: never Original-Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Carlsbad Caverns) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31859 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31859 Steve Harris writes: > I'm still confused about whether Courier could still present a > different UID to nnimap. It seem to start at 1 and assigns contigious article numbers to articles, so you should be fine. > Details may not be critical, but progress reports and ideas are > definitely relevant! Someone on the nnimap list acknowledged that Courier work fine, so I guess this is settled. Sorry for spreading my confusion.