From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/58248 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnimap problem solved by removing .agentview and .overview Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:35:43 +0200 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <871xidtl04.fsf@mail.contactor.se> <87llgkp269.fsf@mail.contactor.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1092369420 31375 80.91.224.253 (13 Aug 2004 03:57:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 03:57:00 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M6789@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Aug 13 05:56:54 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BvTBW-0008Rv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:56:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BvTAz-0000oV-00; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:56:21 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BvTAr-0000oP-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:56:13 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BvTAr-0002Dn-76 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:56:13 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FBF3A01FF for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:56:12 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BvTAp-0003wV-00 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:56:11 +0200 Original-Received: from c494102a.s-bi.bostream.se ([217.215.27.65]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:56:11 +0200 Original-Received: from jas by c494102a.s-bi.bostream.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:56:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 41 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c494102a.s-bi.bostream.se User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:aNQP7eXVX10BoUmQqezSVtaVXgU= Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58248 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58248 Mats Lidell writes: >>>>>> Simon wrote: > > Simon> Is there a simple recipe for reproducing this? > > My recipe is like this. > > 1. Send myself a letter. (I have splitting configured so gnus will > automatically place mail form INBOX in the folder 'incoming') > 2. Get new mail by pressing 'g'. See that there is one new letter in > 'incoming'. > 3. Enter the summary for 'incoming' and see that it is the letter I > sent myself. (Don't read it.) > 4. Send myself another letter. > 5. Save and exit gnus and exit (X)Emacs. > 6. Read mail with squirrelmail using the same source (imap and same > server). > 7. See the new mail (the second sent above) in INBOX. (There is no > splitting activated in squirrelmail so the mail stays in INBOX.) > 8. Use squirrelmail to move the new mail to the folder 'incoming' > (simulating the fancy splitting in gnus ;-) > 9. Go to 'incoming' in squirrelmail and look at the two new letters > there. (The two I just sent myself.) (Don't read them.) > 10. Exit squirrelmail. > 11. Start (X)Emacs and go back into gnus. > 12. See that the *Group* says there are two new mails in incoming. > 13. Enter the summary and find only one new letter. The first. This suggest a bug, somewhere; the above should work fine. Could you get *imap-log* dumps from the first and second part of running Gnus? (setq imap-log t) Could you also collect *imap-log* for: 14. Quit summary buffer. 15. rm -rf ~/News/agent/nnimap/SERVER/GROUP 16. C-u RET the summary buffer. Can you see the article in the summary buffer?