From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/29349 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnimap-list-pattern for UoW Date: 02 Mar 2000 12:19:54 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035166032 2248 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:07:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED429D051E for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 06:21:19 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAB20697; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 05:21:07 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 02 Mar 2000 05:20:16 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA08921 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 05:20:04 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from badis.pdc.kth.se (badis.pdc.kth.se [130.237.221.45]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3015D051E for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 06:20:08 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from jas@localhost) by badis.pdc.kth.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA30235; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 12:19:58 +0100 Original-To: Steinar Bang In-Reply-To: Steinar Bang's message of "01 Mar 2000 18:22:32 +0100" Original-Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0804 (Gnus v5.8.4) Emacs/20.4 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29349 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29349 Steinar Bang writes: > >> If I'm about to connect to a UoW imapd, and my folders are residing > >> under ~/imap, would this be a sensible setting of nnimap-list-pattern > >> be ("INBOX" ("imap/" . "*")) ? > >> > >> Or should I go for ("INBOX" "imap/*") ? > > > With the UoW server I believe the two are equivalent. The first is > > more estheticly pleasing though, IMHO. > > That's what I thought. With the first, I can lose the "imap/" part > from the mail group name? No, the REFERENCE stuff is only used when listing mailboxes. All other operations need a fully qualified name, and does not accept a REFERENCE. (IMHO the IMAP base spec should go either way, either remove the REFERENCE cludge from the LIST commands or implement it everywhere.) ((If REFERENCE was implemented on all commands, using a REFERENCE would be a quite OK solution for achieving a short-hand group name of a mailbox. Hm.))