From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/52540
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Getting gpg (or is it pgg?) to play nice with proxy
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 14:05:08 +0200
Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu
Message-ID: <ilu8ytctlor.fsf@latte-wlan.josefsson.org>
References: <un0jzicm1.fsf@axis.com> <uof35lcwm.fsf@axis.com>
	<iluvfwjrzxg.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <uaddsplt1.fsf@axis.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1052741026 7289 80.91.224.249 (12 May 2003 12:03:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 12:03:46 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M1084@lists.math.uh.edu Mon May 12 14:03:45 2003
Return-path: <ding-owner+M1084@lists.math.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19FC1x-0001tQ-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Mon, 12 May 2003 14:03:45 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 19FC3Q-0001iE-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 07:05:16 -0500
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121])
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 19FC3L-0001i9-00
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 12 May 2003 07:05:12 -0500
Original-Received: (qmail 45823 invoked by alias); 12 May 2003 12:05:11 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 45818 invoked from network); 12 May 2003 12:05:11 -0000
Original-Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net (HELO yxa.extundo.com) (217.13.230.178)
  by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 12 May 2003 12:05:11 -0000
Original-Received: from latte-wlan.josefsson.org (yxa.extundo.com [217.13.230.178])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4CC58B4018649
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK)
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 12 May 2003 14:05:09 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Payment: hashcash 1.2 0:030512:ding@gnus.org:2c95d24666c2cb57
X-Hashcash: 0:030512:ding@gnus.org:2c95d24666c2cb57
In-Reply-To: <uaddsplt1.fsf@axis.com> (Niklas Morberg's message of "Mon, 12
 May 2003 11:16:10 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
Precedence: bulk
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52540
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52540

Niklas Morberg <niklas.morberg@axis.com> writes:

> FOO=bar
> ...
> HTTP_PROXY=[my-proxy-server]
>
> The value for HTTP_PROXY is correct.

So it looks likes applications invoked via `call-process-region' see
the same environment variables as `shell-command-on-region', so there
must be something else that is different.  What does gpg output when
you run it in call-process-region vs shell-command-on-region via PGG?
I think there is a buffer *PGG output*, or something, that contains
the output.  It seems weird that one function works and the other
doesn't.  Perhaps gpg condition key fetching on something that depend
on how it is invoked?