From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Subject: Re: Trailing whitespace and PGP/MIME
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:56:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ilubrpq10uw.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3k74e1mrm.fsf@defun.localdomain> (Jesper Harder's message of "Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:02:53 +0100")
Jesper Harder <harder@ifa.au.dk> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
>
>> Jesper Harder <harder@ifa.au.dk> writes:
>>
>>> implementations MUST make sure that no trailing whitespace is
>>> present after the MIME encoding has been applied.
>>>
>>> Fixing it the obvious way would, however, break the intention of this
>>> change:
>>>
>>> 2003-10-27 Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
>>>
>>> * mm-bodies.el (mm-body-encoding): Don't use QP when message body
>>> only consists of short lines and ASCII, when
>>> mm-use-ultra-safe-encoding.
>>
>> I think detecting if there are trailing SPC, and using QP in that case
>> is reasonable. Does this work?
>>
>> - (save-excursion (re-search-forward "^From " nil t))))
>> + (save-excursion (or (re-search-forward "^From " nil t)
>> + (re-search-forward " $" nil t)))))
>
> Yes, but this was what I meant by "the obvious way" :-)
Ah.
> It'll fix pgp/mime, but it will also force QP for inline pgp if you
> use a signature -- which for a lot of people means _always_ -- thus
> more or less reverting the intention of your previous change.
Ah. Hm. Er. So what IS the right thing? The MUST above is for
PGP/MIME, yes, but the _reason_ the MUST is there in the document is
about as valid for plain PGP as it is for PGP/MIME, I think, arguing
that the obvious approach is the right.
One (non-)solution is to warn the user whenever the message content
may not work reliably with plain PGP and ask the user if she wants to
continue, or use PGP/MIME instead. There are many things on this list
now, e.g., non-ASCII, trailing unencoded SPC, data that look dash
escaped. This would be a useful feature, but just move the problem
into the face of the user instead of solving it, and I doubt most
users understand nor want to understand the problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-30 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-30 2:15 Jesper Harder
2003-12-30 9:04 ` Ivan Boldyrev
2003-12-30 11:31 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-12-30 13:12 ` Ivan Boldyrev
2003-12-30 11:05 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-12-30 13:02 ` Jesper Harder
2003-12-30 20:56 ` Simon Josefsson [this message]
2003-12-30 23:29 ` Jesper Harder
2003-12-30 23:52 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-12-31 0:01 ` Russ Allbery
2003-12-30 23:46 ` Russ Allbery
2003-12-31 0:05 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-12-31 2:26 ` Russ Allbery
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ilubrpq10uw.fsf@latte.josefsson.org \
--to=jas@extundo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).