Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Subject: Re: Trailing whitespace and PGP/MIME
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:56:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ilubrpq10uw.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3k74e1mrm.fsf@defun.localdomain> (Jesper Harder's message of "Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:02:53 +0100")

Jesper Harder <harder@ifa.au.dk> writes:

> Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
>
>> Jesper Harder <harder@ifa.au.dk> writes:
>>
>>>    implementations MUST make sure that no trailing whitespace is
>>>    present after the MIME encoding has been applied.
>>>
>>> Fixing it the obvious way would, however, break the intention of this
>>> change:
>>>
>>> 2003-10-27  Simon Josefsson  <jas@extundo.com>
>>>
>>> 	* mm-bodies.el (mm-body-encoding): Don't use QP when message body
>>> 	only consists of short lines and ASCII, when
>>> 	mm-use-ultra-safe-encoding.
>>
>> I think detecting if there are trailing SPC, and using QP in that case
>> is reasonable.  Does this work?
>>
>> -		     (save-excursion (re-search-forward "^From " nil t))))
>> +		     (save-excursion (or (re-search-forward "^From " nil t)
>> +					 (re-search-forward " $" nil t)))))
>
> Yes, but this was what I meant by "the obvious way" :-)

Ah.

> It'll fix pgp/mime, but it will also force QP for inline pgp if you
> use a signature -- which for a lot of people means _always_ -- thus
> more or less reverting the intention of your previous change.

Ah.  Hm.  Er.  So what IS the right thing?  The MUST above is for
PGP/MIME, yes, but the _reason_ the MUST is there in the document is
about as valid for plain PGP as it is for PGP/MIME, I think, arguing
that the obvious approach is the right.

One (non-)solution is to warn the user whenever the message content
may not work reliably with plain PGP and ask the user if she wants to
continue, or use PGP/MIME instead.  There are many things on this list
now, e.g., non-ASCII, trailing unencoded SPC, data that look dash
escaped.  This would be a useful feature, but just move the problem
into the face of the user instead of solving it, and I doubt most
users understand nor want to understand the problem.




  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-30 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-30  2:15 Jesper Harder
2003-12-30  9:04 ` Ivan Boldyrev
2003-12-30 11:31   ` Simon Josefsson
2003-12-30 13:12     ` Ivan Boldyrev
2003-12-30 11:05 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-12-30 13:02   ` Jesper Harder
2003-12-30 20:56     ` Simon Josefsson [this message]
2003-12-30 23:29       ` Jesper Harder
2003-12-30 23:52         ` Simon Josefsson
2003-12-31  0:01           ` Russ Allbery
2003-12-30 23:46       ` Russ Allbery
2003-12-31  0:05         ` Simon Josefsson
2003-12-31  2:26           ` Russ Allbery

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ilubrpq10uw.fsf@latte.josefsson.org \
    --to=jas@extundo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).