From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Subject: In-Reply-To lost when going via drafts?
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 12:01:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ilubrz5qw7w.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (raw)
I sent one message to myself, and replied to it directly in the
summary buffer, and then also replied to the original message and
saved the reply to the drafts folder, entered the drafts folder and D
E'd the message and sent the reply. The latter message doesn't
contain a In-Reply-To whereas the former does. Is this intentional?
I recall some changes to the drafts handling recently, but I didn't
follow that thread closely.
--- foo Thu Apr 17 11:56:00 2003
+++ bar Thu Apr 17 11:56:10 2003
@@ -1,28 +1,25 @@
Return-Path: <jas@extundo.com>
Received: from yxa.extundo.com ([unix socket])
- by yxa.extundo.com (Cyrus v2.1.12) with LMTP; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:55:27
+0200
+ by yxa.extundo.com (Cyrus v2.1.12) with LMTP; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:55:47
+0200
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from latte.josefsson.org (yxa.extundo.com [217.13.230.178])
(authenticated bits=0)
- by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3H9tPXK017642
+ by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3H9tkXK017648
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK)
- for <jas@extundo.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:55:26 +0200
+ for <jas@extundo.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:55:46 +0200
To: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Subject: Re: orig
-X-Payment: hashcash 1.2 0:030417:jas@extundo.com:c09e28912391641c
-X-Hashcash: 0:030417:jas@extundo.com:c09e28912391641c
+References: <iluznmpqwhv.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:55:25 +0200
-In-Reply-To: <iluznmpqwhv.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (Simon Josefsson's
- message of "Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:55:08 +0200")
-Message-ID: <iluu1cxqwhe.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
+X-Payment: hashcash 1.2 0:030417:jas@extundo.com:14ffd3c2f0a480fe
+X-Hashcash: 0:030417:jas@extundo.com:14ffd3c2f0a480fe
+Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:55:46 +0200
+Message-ID: <iluhe8xqwgt.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
-References: <iluznmpqwhv.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
-X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-29.2 required=5.0
- tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
- USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
+X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-19.4 required=5.0
+ tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
autolearn=ham version=2.50
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
@@ -30,5 +27,5 @@
> orig
-direct reply
+reply via drafts
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-17 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-17 10:01 Simon Josefsson [this message]
2003-04-17 14:51 ` Reiner Steib
2003-04-17 18:10 ` Jason R. Mastaler
2003-04-27 3:05 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ilubrz5qw7w.fsf@latte.josefsson.org \
--to=jas@extundo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).