From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38009 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: self-contained nnml Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 11:44:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87itfkvac5.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035173659 18510 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:14:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 14762 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2001 09:44:46 -0000 Original-Received: from dolk.extundo.com (195.42.214.242) by gnus.org with SMTP; 19 Aug 2001 09:44:46 -0000 Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (slipsten.extundo.com [195.42.214.241]) (authenticated) by dolk.extundo.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7J9ikw16343; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 11:44:47 +0200 Original-To: Daniel Pittman In-Reply-To: <87itfkvac5.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> (Daniel Pittman's message of "Sun, 19 Aug 2001 16:21:30 +1000") Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) Original-Lines: 50 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38009 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38009 Daniel Pittman writes: > Recompile, yada, yada, then we boot XEmacs and it starts Gnus... > > ...the bootstrapping of the NNML marks works just fine. Does the .marks file contain correct marks for the nnml groups? (If so, backup them now :-)) > Then I note that the summary buffer is ... odd. The majority of my > groups seem to have three articles in them now, which is odd, given the > standard set is > 2000 for most of them. What does `G E' on the group show? Does `g' or `M-g' change anything? Does the .marks file contain exactly the same marks as `G E'? > So, this is odd. To continue testing, I try entering the group where I > file the output of my log monitors and such. It's only got one message > in it, which is nice. > > It, of course, reports one unread out of three articles. Trying to enter > the group results in the single message being marked read but *no* > indication of a summary buffer. Ho, hum. So, to get this right, it says 1/3 in the group buffer, you press RET and you don't get a summary buffer and now it says 0/3. Did I understand you correctly? What was the error message you got when trying to enter the group? > So, I make the last test and 'g' in the groups buffer, which restores > the system message to life. Ugh. It says 1/3 in the group buffer again? Entering the summary buffer still doesn't work? Do you have more than one nnml server, btw? Could you edebug `nnml-request-update-info'? Especially compare the `info' on input with how it looks when the function is about to terminate. I committed some fixes, one of them may make a difference so please try latest CVS first. Weird, I can't trigger this at all. It just works. But I only have one test nnml server. Maybe there's a proble if you have more than one nnml server.