From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32407 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Moodwatch Date: 12 Sep 2000 18:21:20 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <20000912101409.F65320@kens.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168681 19554 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:51:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05754D051E for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 12:23:30 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAC06079; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 11:22:26 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 12 Sep 2000 11:21:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA19893 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 11:21:28 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from vic20.blipp.com (unknown [195.163.165.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CA2D051E for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 12:21:46 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vic20.blipp.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e8CGLIZ13093; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 18:21:23 +0200 Original-To: Karl Kleinpaste In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32407 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32407 Karl Kleinpaste writes: > I think I could glue this into my keyword generator really easily. > After figuring keywords, compare & count against a list of obscenities > (a configurable list, of course :-). The paper that described the theory behind this seemed to suggest that it did some phrase analysis too. Perhaps we should pipe mail into M-x doctor and see if it upset the doctor before displaying mail to the user? Err, or, perhaps, not.