From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/61280 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Slow expiry with nnimap+Courier [patch] Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:22:06 +0100 Message-ID: References: <29ll0gpi1k.fsf@itl-pc9.hut.fi> <4nd5lkgj5v.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130927247 32467 80.91.229.2 (2 Nov 2005 10:27:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m9812@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Nov 02 11:27:27 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXFoM-0002vI-FY for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:25:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EXFoF-0000mS-00; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:25:35 -0600 Original-Received: from nas02.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.40]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EXFl6-0000mN-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:22:20 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas02.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EXFl3-0000tF-0M for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:22:20 -0600 Original-Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net ([217.13.230.178] helo=yxa.extundo.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EXFkw-000506-00 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:22:10 +0100 Original-Received: from latte.josefsson.org (c494102a.s-bi.bostream.se [217.215.27.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by yxa.extundo.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jA2AM7GN015522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:22:08 +0100 Original-To: "Jouni K Seppanen" OpenPGP: id=B565716F; url=http://josefsson.org/key.txt X-Hashcash: 1:21:051102:jks@iki.fi::hT7XJZtUDWhysmob:O6N X-Hashcash: 1:21:051102:ding@gnus.org::q1y/b2GyGmfcym9s:RtE In-Reply-To: <4nd5lkgj5v.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "1 Nov 2005 16:19:56 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on yxa-iv X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84, clamav-milter version 0.84e on yxa.extundo.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61280 Archived-At: "Ted Zlatanov" writes: > On 26 Oct 2005, jks@iki.fi wrote: > >> So it seems that Courier is doing something very suboptimal with the >> Gnus command. The attached patch (against 5.10.6) seems to have >> helped: now exiting the INBOX summary takes something like 2 seconds >> instead of the previous 30. > > Is there any reason why the faster behavior should not be the default? > Is it slower on non-Courier servers? Yes, it may generate more network traffic, and may require servers to search more messages for flag changes too.