From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/61553 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Bad interaction between nnimap + agent + expiry (bug?) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:11:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134598597 24742 80.91.229.2 (14 Dec 2005 22:16:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+m10085@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Dec 14 23:16:36 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Emes6-0004HI-C0 for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:13:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1Emes1-0007En-00; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:13:09 -0600 Original-Received: from nas02.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.40]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1Emeqd-0007Eh-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:11:43 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas02.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EmeqU-0004S7-35 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:11:43 -0600 Original-Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net ([217.13.230.178] helo=yxa.extundo.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EmeqO-0005gb-00 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:11:28 +0100 Original-Received: from latte.josefsson.org (jas@yxa.extundo.com [217.13.230.178]) (authenticated bits=0) by yxa.extundo.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBEMBKbm004992 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:11:21 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org OpenPGP: id=B565716F; url=http://josefsson.org/key.txt X-Hashcash: 1:21:051214:ding@gnus.org::8ARwfRew6UvXrXWq:0Ipv In-Reply-To: (Steven E. Harris's message of "Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:44:26 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on yxa-iv X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84, clamav-milter version 0.84e on yxa.extundo.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61553 Archived-At: "Steven E. Harris" writes: > Simon Josefsson writes: > >> Yes. The E mark should be visible in the Summary buffer on the >> second Gnus if the first Gnus had set the mark. > > I've noticed messages marked as expirable in one instance not be > recognized as expirable in another. (Mark message while at work, go > home, connect, and find the same message unmarked.) The server does > appear to support client flags: > > ,---- > | 252 SELECT "INBOX" > | * FLAGS (gnus-expire gnus-forward gnus-dormant \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) > | * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (gnus-expire gnus-forward gnus-dormant \* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited > | * 148 EXISTS > | * 0 RECENT > | * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1067275254] Ok > | * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL > | 252 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok > `---- > > I'll have to try some debugging and see if I can reproduce the > problem. Following how flags are set on a particular message in *imap-log* in both Gnus may help.