From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/52132 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Overbearing undownloaded face Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 14:24:25 +0200 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051878209 19698 80.91.224.249 (2 May 2003 12:23:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 12:23:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M675@lists.math.uh.edu Fri May 02 14:23:27 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19BZZX-00057Z-00 for ; Fri, 02 May 2003 14:23:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19BZad-0007Gx-00; Fri, 02 May 2003 07:24:35 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19BZaZ-0007Gs-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 02 May 2003 07:24:31 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 28249 invoked by alias); 2 May 2003 12:24:30 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 28244 invoked from network); 2 May 2003 12:24:30 -0000 Original-Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net (HELO yxa.extundo.com) (217.13.230.178) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 2 May 2003 12:24:30 -0000 Original-Received: from latte.josefsson.org (yxa.extundo.com [217.13.230.178]) (authenticated bits=0) by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h42COPbU009516 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Fri, 2 May 2003 14:24:26 +0200 Original-To: Harry Putnam Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Payment: hashcash 1.2 0:030502:hgp@sbcglobal.net:2fa28ef9a94a603c X-Hashcash: 0:030502:hgp@sbcglobal.net:2fa28ef9a94a603c X-Payment: hashcash 1.2 0:030502:ding@gnus.org:77e1ab96c240f008 X-Hashcash: 0:030502:ding@gnus.org:77e1ab96c240f008 In-Reply-To: (Harry Putnam's message of "Thu, 01 May 2003 18:49:12 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52132 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52132 Harry Putnam writes: > I've recently come back to using the agent after several mnths of > running plugged only. The current setup with undownloaded face seems > to overpower other long standing faces and options. Yup. I've been using this, perhaps the defaults should be changed? Currently undownloadable marks is more important than, say, tick marks, which doesn't seem right to me. And I was used to the black marks on unread messages. I sent a message asking for opinions about this a few months ago, but now that I try to find my message, I note that it contained a screen shot so it was probably rejected due to size. So: Opinions? --- gnus-sum.el.~6.342.~ Tue Apr 29 02:44:20 2003 +++ gnus-sum.el Fri May 2 14:16:54 2003 @@ -902,12 +902,6 @@ (defcustom gnus-summary-highlight '(((eq mark gnus-canceled-mark) . gnus-summary-cancelled-face) - ((and uncached (> score default-high)) - . gnus-summary-high-undownloaded-face) - ((and uncached (< score default-low)) - . gnus-summary-low-undownloaded-face) - (uncached - . gnus-summary-normal-undownloaded-face) ((and (> score default-high) (or (eq mark gnus-dormant-mark) (eq mark gnus-ticked-mark))) @@ -935,6 +929,12 @@ . gnus-summary-high-read-face) ((< score default-low) . gnus-summary-low-read-face) + ((and uncached (> score default-high)) + . gnus-summary-high-undownloaded-face) + ((and uncached (< score default-low)) + . gnus-summary-low-undownloaded-face) + (uncached + . gnus-summary-normal-undownloaded-face) (t . gnus-summary-normal-read-face)) "*Controls the highlighting of summary buffer lines.