From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38345
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: New marks stuff
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 18:14:56 +0200
Message-ID: <iluheuto4xr.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
References: <m1n14wgz4y.fsf@reader.newsguy.com>
	<ruon14pxq1q.fsf@g.wolfram.com> <2nk7ztfdry.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet>
	<sh1ym0octn.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174222 21851 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:23:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:23:42 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <jas@extundo.com>
Return-Path: <jas@extundo.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 10760 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2001 16:15:20 -0000
Original-Received: from dolk.extundo.com (195.42.214.242)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 16:15:20 -0000
Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (slipsten.extundo.com [195.42.214.241])
	(authenticated)
	by dolk.extundo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f7RGFOh28627;
	Mon, 27 Aug 2001 18:15:25 +0200
Original-To: Karl Eichwalder <keichwa@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <sh1ym0octn.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de> (Karl Eichwalder's message
 of "Sat, 25 Aug 2001 08:47:48 +0200")
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104
Original-Lines: 20
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38345
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38345

Karl Eichwalder <keichwa@gmx.net> writes:

>>> Incoming mail in at least one group, may main "incoming" group, is
>>> marked as read before I ever see it.  Now where's that pre-oort
>>> tarball...
>>
>> The problem was fixed in Monday.
>
> Yes, it's getting better.  But article previously marked for expiration
> are back as 'unread'; maybe, it's considered to work this way the first
> time you'll switch from an old Gnus to a recent version (with the new
> mark stuff)?

No.

This sounds familiar to what some nnimap users has reported in the
past.  Maybe the expiring code doesn't call nnfoo-request-set-mark,
but simply updates the group info.

Do you still see it?  I'll try to reproduce it.