From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37462 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Backend writing Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2001 14:36:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172874 14035 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:01:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 17493 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2001 12:35:08 -0000 Original-Received: from dolk.extundo.com (195.42.214.242) by gnus.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2001 12:35:08 -0000 Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (slipsten.extundo.com [195.42.214.241]) (authenticated) by dolk.extundo.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f74CZBw04043 for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 14:35:11 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (prj@po.cwru.edu's message of "Fri, 03 Aug 2001 20:57:58 -0400") Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104 Original-Lines: 24 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37462 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37462 prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes: > Simon Josefsson writes: >> You couldn't have the nnmaildir spool NFS mounted and use the agent >> when you don't have network connectivity, could you? > > I suppose not. I don't use caching or the agent; when I did this, I > didn't know it would break things. But people can use the agent on > some servers and not others, right? Then, at least, they could just > run with the nnmaildir server closed whenever the NFS mount was > unavailable. Sure. >> Do you also frob group info to renumber the marks? When do you do >> this? Do you use nnchoke-request-update-info? > > Yes. Article numbers aren't stored on disk at all; -request-scan > creates the mapping anew each time you close and reopen the server, > and only keeps it in memory. Then -request-update-info translates the > stored marks into a whole new group info. Hm, how are the permanent marks stored? Doesn't maildir use integers as (permanent) article identifiers?