Re: more on accessing the body via split rules...

[Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>]

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> > Right, it would make sense to me that the
> > gnus-original-article-buffer variable should be updated during
> > splitting, and set back to the previous value after splitting is
> > done.
> > 
> > how does that sound?
> 
> I think that's not the right buffer, for gnus-original-article-buffer
> is used when _displaying_ a message, not during splitting.  That is,
> if you look at the *Article* buffer then you see a munged copy of the
> contents of the original article buffer.
> 
> Maybe introduce a new variable nnmail-original-message-buffer?

Yes, g-o-a-b is definitely wrong.  How about this?

	* nnmail.el (nnmail-incoming-buffer): New variable.
	(nnmail-split-incoming): Use it.

--- nnmail.el.~6.13.~	Sun May  6 02:15:16 2001
+++ nnmail.el	Fri May 18 23:00:36 2001
@@ -450,6 +450,8 @@
 (defvar nnmail-split-tracing nil)
 (defvar nnmail-split-trace nil)
 
+(defvar nnmail-incoming-buffer " *nnmail incoming*")
+
 \f
 
 (defconst nnmail-version "nnmail 1.0"
@@ -896,7 +898,7 @@
 				nnmail-split-methods)))
     (save-excursion
       ;; Insert the incoming file.
-      (set-buffer (get-buffer-create " *nnmail incoming*"))
+      (set-buffer (get-buffer-create nnmail-incoming-buffer))
       (erase-buffer)
       (let ((coding-system-for-read nnmail-incoming-coding-system))
 	(mm-insert-file-contents incoming))