From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/45289
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Compiled format specs in .newsrc.eld?
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 17:56:20 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <iluit4hlx0b.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
References: <m3n0txxtsr.fsf@defun.localdomain>
	<vaffzzo1lz3.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3znxwklm2.fsf@defun.localdomain>
	<vafn0tvr145.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<yotl3cvmksry.fsf@jpl.org>
	<vaf3cvmav6u.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<ilusn3mhuil.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<m37kky0zf2.fsf@defun.localdomain>
	<iluofeakn0k.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<m34rg2gcqc.fsf@defun.localdomain>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1024329430 13518 127.0.0.1 (17 Jun 2002 15:57:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 15:57:10 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17JysQ-0003Vu-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 17:57:10 +0200
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 17Jyrw-0005TW-00; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:56:40 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:56:58 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA05550
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:56:46 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 15620 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2002 15:56:23 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 15615 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2002 15:56:22 -0000
Original-Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net (HELO yxa.extundo.com) (217.13.230.178)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2002 15:56:22 -0000
Original-Received: from latte.josefsson.org (yxa.extundo.com [217.13.230.178])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g5HFuKlf023664;
	Mon, 17 Jun 2002 17:56:20 +0200
Original-To: Jesper Harder <harder@ifa.au.dk>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
In-Reply-To: <m34rg2gcqc.fsf@defun.localdomain> (Jesper Harder's message of
 "Mon, 17 Jun 2002 17:13:15 +0200")
Original-Lines: 17
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.3.50
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:45289
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:45289

Jesper Harder <harder@ifa.au.dk> writes:

> jas@extundo.com (Simon Josefsson) writes:
>
>> Does it improve alot to do M-x gnus-compile?
>
> I don't think `gnus-compile' matters much.  The *really* important
> formats specs (e.g. the one controlling summary buffer lines) are
> byte-compiled automatically (unless you set `gnus-use-byte-compile' to
> nil).
>
>>  Anyone care to benchmark?
>
> There's no difference for summary buffer generation.  Of course, that's
> hardly surprising, since there *shouldn't* be any difference.

So why the we bother fixing it? ;-)