From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38818
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: announce: nnmaildir 2001.09.11
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:37:51 +0200
Message-ID: <iluiteg6uz4.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
References: <m3d74yb8ze.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<hhofo83ne1.fsf@nightshade.la.mastaler.com>
	<m3u1y05yqj.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu> <2nlmjctpol.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet>
	<m3adzs5pm3.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<iluzo7s8gk6.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
	<2nzo7srzr7.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174623 24555 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:30:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:30:23 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <jas@extundo.com>
Return-Path: <jas@extundo.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 18410 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2001 21:37:50 -0000
Original-Received: from dolk.extundo.com (195.42.214.242)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2001 21:37:50 -0000
Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (slipsten.extundo.com [195.42.214.241])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by dolk.extundo.com (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id f8ILbv0r013353
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:37:58 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <2nzo7srzr7.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet> (ShengHuo ZHU's message of
 "Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:49:00 -0400")
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105
Original-Lines: 13
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38818
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38818

ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu> writes:

>>> I'd prefer public domain, if that's acceptable.
>>
>> Does anyone know if it is acceptable?  I'm thinking of a recent
>> gnus-spec.el patch.
>
> Because Gnus will become part of Emacs, I don't think that FSF will
> accept a file without the copyright assignment.

Ok.  I backed out the patch to gnus-spec.el I was thinking about.
Anyone that wants to reimplement it?  The problem is explained in
<87itf461hj.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net>.