From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32511 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: doc bug? IMAP info misleading Date: 20 Sep 2000 13:19:37 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168786 20248 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:53:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504F0D051E for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 11:39:11 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAC27049; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 06:19:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 20 Sep 2000 06:19:03 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA17124 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 06:18:53 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from vic20.blipp.com (unknown [195.163.165.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6832BD051E for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 07:19:16 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vic20.blipp.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e8KBJCS18927; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 13:19:15 +0200 Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) In-Reply-To: Mail-Copies-To: nobody Original-Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32511 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32511 Simon Josefsson writes: > > I think the Gnus info file is misleading wrt IMAP setup, but I'm not > > sure what to do about it. > > I agree. Examples rules. If select method specification was customized, I think this would be a minor problem instead of a major one.