From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/45831
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Expiry still broken for nnml?
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 20:31:56 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <iluk7nixrvn.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
References: <87k7nkdgj6.fsf@nwalsh.com> <ilu3cu630ay.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<vafsn26iew8.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1027708380 13236 127.0.0.1 (26 Jul 2002 18:33:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 18:33:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Y9ta-0003RF-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 20:32:58 +0200
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 17Y9t1-0001oX-00; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 13:32:23 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 26 Jul 2002 13:32:48 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA28565
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 13:32:37 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 18562 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2002 18:32:02 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 18557 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2002 18:32:01 -0000
Original-Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net (HELO yxa.extundo.com) (217.13.230.178)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 26 Jul 2002 18:32:01 -0000
Original-Received: from latte.josefsson.org (yxa.extundo.com [217.13.230.178])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6QIVvkd031597;
	Fri, 26 Jul 2002 20:31:57 +0200
Original-To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Hashcash: 020726:ndw@nwalsh.com:d1f937af99e56ed7
X-Hashcash: 020726:ding@gnus.org:4cbb79eb1381f703
In-Reply-To: <vafsn26iew8.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's
 message of "Fri, 26 Jul 2002 19:21:27 +0200")
Original-Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.3.50
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:45831
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:45831

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
>
>> Does removing the expiry-wait parameter help?  I'm not sure what
>> semantic that variable and total expiring actually should imply.
>
> What's the relationship between total-expire and expiry-wait that
> creates problems?  Ideally, expiry-wait refers to the time when the
> message was marked as expirable, and total-expire just means that the
> message is marked as expirable when it is marked as read.  No?

You are right.  Hm.  I don't know why it doesn't work, then.