Re: Sieve support?

[Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>]

Amos Gouaux <amos+lists.ding@utdallas.edu> writes:

>>>>>> On Sun, 04 Nov 2001 15:49:22 +0100,
>>>>>> Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> (sb) writes:
>
> sb> Hmm... looks like Cyrus 2 is on the way, for the one who waits
> sb>        <http://bugs.debian.org/108942>
>
> If not yet running 2.x, I would wait until 2.1 is released.  Many
> bugs have been fixed in this up-coming release.  I'd even say that
> 2.x out of CVS would be better than one of the 2.0 releases.
> Rapidly evolving stuff, but then folks here know all about that.

I've been running the same 2.x release for almost a year...

> Personally, I think folks are also better off doing the compiles
> themself instead of using pre-compiled packages.  Seems like many
> folks run into problems because the pre-compiled stuff isn't always
> in sync with the numerous dependencies, most particularly Berkeley DB.

Are you saying that if you compile the package yourself, you _won't_
get Berkeley DB problems?  Wow! :-)

(I'm stuck at the 2.x release I'm using just because of libdb
problems, all db utilities crash when I export the SASL db, and no
matter which version of libdb I compile with, the new Cyrus doesn't
like my current db.  I have working binaries but no way of compiling
new working ones.  Libdb is double-plus ungood.)