From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38414
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: '.' at the beginning of summary buffer lines
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:00:08 +0200
Message-ID: <ilulmk2ssx3.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
References: <871ylyiv43.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <m3pu9ibu4t.fsf@enberg.org>
	<vxk3d6er9vy.fsf@cinnamon.vanillaknot.com>
	<87heuuhcon.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
	<q6msneeirdi.fsf@spartacus.utdallas.edu>
	<ylwv3qtu4p.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
	<iluy9o6h5sg.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
	<m17kvmg9wv.fsf@reader.newsguy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174281 22269 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:24:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:24:41 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <jas@extundo.com>
Return-Path: <jas@extundo.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 6597 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 17:00:42 -0000
Original-Received: from dolk.extundo.com (195.42.214.242)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 17:00:42 -0000
Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (slipsten.extundo.com [195.42.214.241])
	(authenticated)
	by dolk.extundo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f7TH0lh24167;
	Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:00:47 +0200
Original-To: Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com>
In-Reply-To: <m17kvmg9wv.fsf@reader.newsguy.com> (Harry Putnam's message of
 "Wed, 29 Aug 2001 08:31:28 -0700")
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104
Original-Lines: 17
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38414
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38414

Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:

>>>> fw> (Please don't use '`' as a quote sign.  Thanks.)
>>>
>>>> Why is that?  It's often used in info docs....
>>>
>>> See <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/quotes.html>.
>>
>> Anyone know how to insert the U+2018 and U+2019 characters in emacs?
>> (Is the characters part of some 8859 or 2002 character set maybe?)
>
> Simon, 
> Did anyone reply to you on that, privately or something.  If so can
> you summarize for us?

Sorry, I didn't find out the answer.  I'm still curious though, using
U+2018 would perhaps make everyone happy.  (Except the ASCII-lovers.)