From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36294
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: more on accessing the body via split rules...
Date: 21 May 2001 19:29:59 +0200
Message-ID: <ilulmnq7gq0.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
References: <87r8xmg02v.fsf@mclinux.com> <87d796d5xw.fsf@mclinux.com>
	<vafg0e2iql6.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <878zjud3cs.fsf@mclinux.com>
	<vafvgmyh9yc.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <87wv7e7acu.fsf@mclinux.com>
	<vaf66eycvrr.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<iluheyi9xim.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
	<vafn18ae0sd.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<ilu4ruh67g8.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
	<vafheyh1t67.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <871ypi7q10.fsf@mclinux.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171904 7841 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:45:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:45:04 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 12151 invoked by alias); 21 May 2001 17:29:49 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 12146 invoked from network); 21 May 2001 17:29:48 -0000
Original-Received: from dolk.extundo.com (195.42.214.242)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 21 May 2001 17:29:48 -0000
Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (slipsten.extundo.com [195.42.214.241])
	(authenticated)
	by dolk.extundo.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4LHTrq16884
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 21 May 2001 19:29:54 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <871ypi7q10.fsf@mclinux.com> (Josh Huber's message of "21 May 2001 10:08:59 -0400")
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.103
Original-Lines: 17
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36294
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36294

Josh Huber <huber@alum.wpi.edu> writes:

> > If this would happen, that would be good enough, I guess.  Then, split
> > rules wishing to access the message body can look in
> > nnmail-incoming-buffer.
> > 
> > Josh?
> 
> It doesn't happen.  I put a (debug) inside my fancy split function,
> and checked out the values of the variables and what buffers existed.
> gnus-original-article-buffer definitely points to < *Original
> Article*> and said buffer contains the message being re-spooled.
> 
> Should it copy the message into nnmail-incoming-buffer beforehand?

Yes, and looking at the code it looks like it does, but maybe I'm
reading it wrong.  The article would be in g-o-a-b as well.