From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/33398 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: message-forward-ignored-headers is incomplete Date: 17 Nov 2000 15:23:33 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169513 24947 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:05:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25826D049A for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 09:22:48 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAB11106; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 08:22:38 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 17 Nov 2000 08:22:01 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA22652 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 08:21:52 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from dolk.extundo.com (dolk.extundo.com [195.42.214.242]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D75D049A for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 09:22:13 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated) by dolk.extundo.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eAHEMAq12296; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 15:22:11 +0100 Original-To: Eric Marsden In-Reply-To: Mail-Copies-To: nobody Original-Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33398 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33398 Eric Marsden writes: > I would also like to have Received headers removed when forwarding, > as they contain information about the receiver's network topology > which there is no reason to divulge. Oh no! I often ask people to "forward that mail to me" so that I can take a look at received headers to diagnose problems. If "forward" doesn't send the complete mail, it's useless when debugging problems. Received: should stay, IMHO.