From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49829
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Saving some read IMAP messages to a local folder
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 07:30:26 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <iluof5r6xz1.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
References: <87d6mdtk8x.fsf@logicacmg.com> <ur8apsp6n.fsf@axis.com>
	<ilun0ld8zme.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <ubs1sbf53.fsf@axis.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044426561 23651 80.91.224.249 (5 Feb 2003 06:29:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 06:29:21 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18gJ3g-00069J-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 07:29:20 +0100
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 18gJ54-0000lL-00; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:30:46 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:31:43 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA15756
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 00:31:30 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 39461 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2003 06:30:29 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 39456 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2003 06:30:29 -0000
Original-Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net (HELO yxa.extundo.com) (217.13.230.178)
  by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 5 Feb 2003 06:30:29 -0000
Original-Received: from latte.josefsson.org (yxa.extundo.com [217.13.230.178])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h156UReE009996
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 07:30:27 +0100
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Payment: hashcash 1.1 0:030205:ding@gnus.org:760e8adfd5d14269
X-Hashcash: 0:030205:ding@gnus.org:760e8adfd5d14269
In-Reply-To: <ubs1sbf53.fsf@axis.com> (Niklas Morberg's message of "Tue, 04
 Feb 2003 09:53:44 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu)
X-Face: %bo>yc#X1.-jVa-<s"DQ^4?^PZAo;0a4~Kve&eC`.SGU_L!+28$Zb:is+#k/e?B1tjq7q0I
 nEu[-9[ohz4/Pc!?ivpiGu<BihTP5heHY).&A[se*\wf_!_#UkEo
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49829
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49829

Niklas Morberg <niklas.morberg@axis.com> writes:

> Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
>
>> Is the default for g-a-e-d (7) a good one? 
>
> I don't think so, no.

I committed the patch.  While at it, I started cleaning up
gnus-agent-expire too.  Is there a reason that function is wrapped in
a unwind-protect (now in g-a-e-1)?  I think it is better to handle
whatever errors crop up during its execution instead, and if it still
breaks users will be informed and can send a bug report.