From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55564 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [gnus.gnus-bug] [Regression] Why is my Summary buffer green? Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 23:49:22 +0100 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1073170193 27432 80.91.224.253 (3 Jan 2004 22:49:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 22:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M4104@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Jan 03 23:49:50 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Acuac-0007TV-00 for ; Sat, 03 Jan 2004 23:49:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AcuaR-0004Pw-00; Sat, 03 Jan 2004 16:49:39 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AcuaN-0004Pr-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 03 Jan 2004 16:49:35 -0600 Original-Received: from yxa.extundo.com (178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net [217.13.230.178]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960743A0026; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 16:49:33 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from latte.josefsson.org (yxa.extundo.com [217.13.230.178]) (authenticated bits=0) by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i03MnVAU005275 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 3 Jan 2004 23:49:32 +0100 Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Hashcash: 0:040103:larsi@gnus.org:0ced7ea80592ed02 X-Hashcash: 0:040103:ding@gnus.org:803484e15e4cddcd In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 03 Jan 2004 13:21:16 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1004 (Gnus v5.10.4) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55564 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55564 I don't see this (perhaps because my gnus-select-article-hook call gnus-agent-fetch-selected-article), but one idea is that this patch might help. I think this has been discussed before. --- gnus-sum.el.~6.376.~ 2004-01-03 23:45:28.000000000 +0100 +++ gnus-sum.el 2004-01-03 23:48:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -907,12 +907,6 @@ (defcustom gnus-summary-highlight '(((eq mark gnus-canceled-mark) . gnus-summary-cancelled-face) - ((and uncached (> score default-high)) - . gnus-summary-high-undownloaded-face) - ((and uncached (< score default-low)) - . gnus-summary-low-undownloaded-face) - (uncached - . gnus-summary-normal-undownloaded-face) ((and (> score default-high) (or (eq mark gnus-dormant-mark) (eq mark gnus-ticked-mark))) @@ -940,6 +934,12 @@ . gnus-summary-high-read-face) ((< score default-low) . gnus-summary-low-read-face) + ((and uncached (> score default-high)) + . gnus-summary-high-undownloaded-face) + ((and uncached (< score default-low)) + . gnus-summary-low-undownloaded-face) + (uncached + . gnus-summary-normal-undownloaded-face) (t . gnus-summary-normal-read-face)) "*Controls the highlighting of summary buffer lines. Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > This really should be fixed, I think. What's the minimal solution > for making this work better? > > From: Malcolm Purvis > Subject: [Regression] Why is my Summary buffer green? > Newsgroups: gnus.gnus-bug > Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 21:59:42 +1100 > > Gnus v5.10.5 > XEmacs 21.4 (patch 14) "Reasonable Discussion" [Lucid] (powerpc-unknown-linux) of Sat Nov 22 2003 on c18072.rivrw2.nsw.optusnet.com.au > 200 NNRP Service Ready (posting ok). > > [I Think that Kai has already reported this but I don't think it made much > impact] > > This is a picture of my summary buffer for aus.rail when using CVS gnus > updated a few minutes ago: > > > > Note how all the articles are all the one colour. This contrasts with 5.10.2 > using exactly the same setup: > > > > I think that it is related to relatively recent agent changes, but for > whatever reason it is a regression and should be fixed before No Gnus starts. > > Is there any chance that this could be done? I find it a lot harder to find > unread articles because I'm used to the different colours. > > Malcolm > > > ---------- > > > > -- > If you want an explanation on what you have just read, please > refer to .