Re: gpg-ring.el/gpg.el?

[Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>]

Josh Huber <huber@alum.wpi.edu> writes:

> Is there a reason gpg.el isn't included in the main dist yet?

FSF doesn't have papers for it.

> [1]  Signing/encrypting multipart messages should be done
>      automatically, IMHO.  I'll try and figure this out -- the problem
>      is that if you send someone an encrypted mail with an attachment,
>      C-c C-m c p just does one part, encrypting the text before the
>      attachment, leaving the attachment in the clear.

C-c C-m c p encrypts the current MIME part.  If you C-c C-m c p on a
multipart part, the entire multipart is encrypted.