From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32343 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Destructive nature of gnus-summary-mail-forward Date: 06 Sep 2000 23:58:37 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87d7ihb3x9.fsf@tea.thpoon.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168629 19217 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:50:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98188D051E for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 18:00:14 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAC02805; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:59:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 06 Sep 2000 16:58:40 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA12827 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:58:31 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from vic20.blipp.com (unknown [195.163.165.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3F9D051E for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 17:58:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vic20.blipp.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e86Lwkl19965 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 23:58:46 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87d7ihb3x9.fsf@tea.thpoon.com> Original-Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (GTK) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32343 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32343 Arcady Genkin writes: > It seems that `S o m' in summary buffer deletes the forwarded article > (at least in my imap group). Is this intended behavior? I don't think so. I can't reproduce that though. Could you (setq imap-log "*imap-log*") and mail me the content of the *imap-log* buffer after doing S o m, quiting a group, re-enter it and verify your article is gone?