Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Subject: Re: asynch prefetch backtrace
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 04:28:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ilur8bonwvk.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m31y3qq52p.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 06 Jan 2003 05:23:42 +0100")

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>
>> Yes, that seem to be the case.  (That's odd.  I really thought that
>> the async stuff should work for all backends.  Do I misremember
>> totally?  Am I misreading the code?  I have a suspicion that there's
>> something I'm not remembering...)
>
> Ah, now I know.  Most gnus-async doesn't know anything about the
> method the back end is using to fetch the articles (which is proper),
> but the new function (well, from 1998) `gnus-async-wait-for-article'
> does look deep into backend internals.  Which is a bug.
>
> The point of that function is to see whether we're trying to select
> the article which is just arriving in the async buffer, and if so,
> wait until it's arrived.
>
> The easy fix for this is to just move the function to the back end,
> define a new back end interface function, and have gnus-async call
> that instead.

But asynchronous prefetching has worked for ages, with nnimap too, and
now it normally works but not when there is a very large article in
the summary buffer.  Weird.

Is anyone else seeing this?  Maybe I have broken something locally.




  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-08  3:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-03 14:49 Simon Josefsson
2003-01-03 20:14 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-01-05 20:27   ` Simon Josefsson
2003-01-06  2:28     ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-01-06  4:23       ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-01-08  3:28         ` Simon Josefsson [this message]
2003-01-08  4:19           ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ilur8bonwvk.fsf@latte.josefsson.org \
    --to=jas@extundo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).