From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37516 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: "> > >" space removal removes too many spaces? Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 15:10:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172917 14287 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:01:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 19627 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2001 13:09:34 -0000 Original-Received: from dolk.extundo.com (195.42.214.242) by gnus.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2001 13:09:34 -0000 Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (slipsten.extundo.com [195.42.214.241]) (authenticated) by dolk.extundo.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f75D9cw14514; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 15:09:38 +0200 Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Sun, 05 Aug 2001 15:03:36 +0200") Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104 Original-Lines: 29 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37516 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37516 Simon Josefsson writes: > Also, consider the following style as well: > > ,---- >| Kai> Hm. The agent. Hm. I have (gnus-agentize) in my .gnus and the >| Kai> server is under the agent, but I'm always plugged. >| >| If plugged, it shouldn't matter then as it shouldn't be talking to the >| agent (AFAIK). > `---- And consider quoting boxquote's as well. :-) Without the patch I get the above. With the patch I get > Also, consider the following style as well: > > ,---- > | Kai> Hm. The agent. Hm. I have (gnus-agentize) in my .gnus and the > | Kai> server is under the agent, but I'm always plugged. > | > | If plugged, it shouldn't matter then as it shouldn't be talking to the > | agent (AFAIK). > `---- which is better. Sorry for following up on myself, but I just noticed this.