From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23672 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: MS Outlook for mail server? Date: 02 Jul 1999 22:40:34 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87btdv6nul.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161361 3261 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:49:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA11875 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 16:45:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAB10419; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:41:21 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 02 Jul 1999 15:42:06 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00759 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:41:53 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sprat.pdc.kth.se (sprat.pdc.kth.se [130.237.221.225]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA11776 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 16:40:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from jas@localhost) by sprat.pdc.kth.se (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id WAA23415; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 22:40:34 +0200 Original-To: Hrvoje Niksic In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "02 Jul 1999 18:03:14 +0200" Original-Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070088 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.88) Emacs/20.3.10 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23672 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23672 Hrvoje Niksic writes: > Why is that? I mean, why can't Gnus handle it? Elisp strings and > symbols are very clean -- as far as Emacs is concerned, you can well > have NUL characters in them, let alone spaces. Gnus uses some constructs from NNTP when talking to backends, and it uses SPC as a separator. > If Gnus refuses to handle spaces in groups because they are forbidden > on Usenet, maybe Gnus should be fixed to be more lenient for other > backends? Yes.