From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/52165
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Overbearing undownloaded face
Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 01:16:17 +0200
Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu
Message-ID: <iluwuh9djni.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
References: <m2d6j2qfs7.fsf@sbcglobal.net>
	<iluhe8dh6yu.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<m3r87hl3so.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051927240 21013 80.91.224.249 (3 May 2003 02:00:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 02:00:40 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M708@lists.math.uh.edu Sat May 03 04:00:35 2003
Return-path: <ding-owner+M708@lists.math.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19BmK4-0005SP-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Sat, 03 May 2003 04:00:20 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 19BmL6-0004LK-00; Fri, 02 May 2003 21:01:24 -0500
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121])
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 19BjlN-0003OY-00
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 02 May 2003 18:16:21 -0500
Original-Received: (qmail 57607 invoked by alias); 2 May 2003 23:16:21 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 57602 invoked from network); 2 May 2003 23:16:20 -0000
Original-Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net (HELO yxa.extundo.com) (217.13.230.178)
  by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 2 May 2003 23:16:20 -0000
Original-Received: from latte.josefsson.org (yxa.extundo.com [217.13.230.178])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h42NGHbU023468
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK)
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 3 May 2003 01:16:18 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Payment: hashcash 1.2 0:030502:ding@gnus.org:aafd19ac3afaef9f
X-Hashcash: 0:030502:ding@gnus.org:aafd19ac3afaef9f
In-Reply-To: <m3r87hl3so.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's
 message of "Fri, 02 May 2003 18:19:19 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
Precedence: bulk
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52165
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52165

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
>
>> Yup.  I've been using this, perhaps the defaults should be changed?
>> Currently undownloadable marks is more important than, say, tick
>> marks, which doesn't seem right to me.  And I was used to the black
>> marks on unread messages.
>
> But you wouldn't tick undownloaded messages, would you?  (If I
> understand you right...)

I have lots of ticked undownloaded messages.  But perhaps I'm not
using the agent as intended...