From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36495
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: fill bug still there [Re: XEmacs 21.[45] + Oort Gnus 0.03 + Filladapt 2.12: Inf loop]
Date: 29 May 2001 19:20:48 +0200
Message-ID: <iluwv70f4wf.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
References: <3B092ED2.F390356F@inrialpes.fr>
	<yz1wv7an74t.fsf@milhouse.cs.cornell.edu>
	<sxsu22ehjzj.fsf@florida.arsdigita.de>
	<3B092ED2.F390356F@inrialpes.fr>
	<4.3.2.7.2.20010521090646.00d66480@san-francisco.beasys.com>
	<yz1g0dy8s6f.fsf@milhouse.cs.cornell.edu>
	<yz1r8xi1qi3.fsf@milhouse.cs.cornell.edu>
	<yz1d78t1ixo.fsf@milhouse.cs.cornell.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172069 8897 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:47:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:47:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <owner-ding@gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 20320 invoked by alias); 29 May 2001 17:20:43 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 20315 invoked from network); 29 May 2001 17:20:43 -0000
Original-Received: from dolk.extundo.com (195.42.214.242)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 29 May 2001 17:20:43 -0000
Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (slipsten.extundo.com [195.42.214.241])
	(authenticated)
	by dolk.extundo.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4THKlq08059;
	Tue, 29 May 2001 19:20:48 +0200
Original-To: Paul Stodghill <stodghil@cs.cornell.edu>
In-Reply-To: <yz1d78t1ixo.fsf@milhouse.cs.cornell.edu> (Paul Stodghill's message of "28 May 2001 13:45:10 -0400")
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.103
Original-Lines: 14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36495
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36495

Paul Stodghill <stodghil@cs.cornell.edu> writes:

> The XEmacs people have made the changes so that C-g breaks out of the
> infloop that happens as I have described in previous messages.
> 
> However, I never heard from any of the Gnus developers about what is
> causing the infloop in the first place. Below is a backtrace that I was
> able to obtain by killing an infloop'ing XEmacs.
> 
> I can't isolate the particular piece of code that is causing this bug.

If C-g works, could you M-x toggle-debug-on-quit RET before the
infloop, and get a better backtrace where this happens?  What are you
doing when it happens?  (Composing an article in message-mode?)