From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/29463 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Post-It (Was: Re: Incorporate file into summary buffer) Date: 08 Mar 2000 23:04:05 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035166128 2875 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:08:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0E2D051F for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 19:08:46 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAB07451; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 18:08:23 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 08 Mar 2000 18:07:23 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA13765 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 18:07:13 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from badis.pdc.kth.se (badis.pdc.kth.se [130.237.221.45]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2973D051F for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 17:04:21 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from jas@localhost) by badis.pdc.kth.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA06084; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 23:04:06 +0100 Original-To: Arnd Kohrs In-Reply-To: Arnd Kohrs's message of "08 Mar 2000 11:25:00 +0100" Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0804 (Gnus v5.8.4) Emacs/20.6 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29463 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29463 Arnd Kohrs writes: > For me it works very nice. The /reparenting/ stuff I discovered > yesterday. Before that I manually edited always the references to > correct threads. I wish that nnimap allowed editing of messages, so > that my nnimap groups were as flexible. nnimap will never support article editing since IMAP does not support that. Perhaps Gnus could be modified to fall back to article replacing if the backend doesn't support article editing, though.