From: Simon Josefsson <sj@extundo.com>
Subject: C-c C-m or C-c RET?
Date: 24 Dec 2000 01:58:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <iluy9x6zlc9.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org> (raw)
When updating documentation for the `M-m' -> `C-c C-m' change I
noticed that emacs treat `C-c C-m' as `C-c RET'.
To be consistent with `C-h m' etc, we should probably use `C-c RET' in
documentation, but that would lose the mnemonic. Should we mention
both (and the mnemonic?), explaining that they are the same? Sort of
confusing too. What about `C-c m'? Hmm.
next reply other threads:[~2000-12-24 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-24 0:58 Simon Josefsson [this message]
2000-12-24 14:34 ` Florian Weimer
2000-12-26 22:50 ` Kai Großjohann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=iluy9x6zlc9.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org \
--to=sj@extundo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).