From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/33890
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Josefsson <sj@extundo.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: C-c C-m or C-c RET?
Date: 24 Dec 2000 01:58:30 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <iluy9x6zlc9.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169913 27517 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:11:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:11:53 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61ACD04A1
	for <jason@mastaler.com>; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 20:02:28 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAB09992;
	Sat, 23 Dec 2000 18:58:52 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 23 Dec 2000 18:58:20 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA02204
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 18:58:11 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from dolk.extundo.com (dolk.extundo.com [195.42.214.242])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB79D04A1
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 19:58:35 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from barbar.josefsson.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	(authenticated)
	by dolk.extundo.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBO0wY017302
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 24 Dec 2000 01:58:34 +0100
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Original-Lines: 7
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/21.0.94
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33890
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33890

When updating documentation for the `M-m' -> `C-c C-m' change I
noticed that emacs treat `C-c C-m' as `C-c RET'.

To be consistent with `C-h m' etc, we should probably use `C-c RET' in
documentation, but that would lose the mnemonic.  Should we mention
both (and the mnemonic?), explaining that they are the same?  Sort of
confusing too.  What about `C-c m'?  Hmm.