From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:36:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <iluzn2t1qzw.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878yafj2tn.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family>
Alexander Pohoyda <alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net> writes:
> Wouldn't it be good to have these two things clearly separated?
I support this. Although I don't know whether using mm is all that
problematic. I don't think the user need to use mm just because
rfc*.el uses it. Modularizing files from Gnus is generally a good
thing.
As an aside, Lars once said, on the topic of rfc*.el, that "RFCs
wither and die, lisp is forever", arguing against rfc*.el as the name
of lisp files. Instead, the RFC 2047 functionality could be moved
into qp.el, RFC 2231 could be moved into (say) encoded-word.el, etc.
One reason is that RFC numbers are obsoleted once in a while.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-11 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1096006177.432792.29828.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE>
[not found] ` <m3mzzgw2za.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
[not found] ` <1096014084.739640.30529.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE>
[not found] ` <m3fz58vx3l.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
[not found] ` <E1CB6fb-0004I5-Ud@fencepost.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <200410031040.i93Ae1YS000609@oak.pohoyda.family>
[not found] ` <E1CEUc7-0003aQ-C3@fencepost.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <87d5zvwmq9.fsf_-_@oak.pohoyda.family>
[not found] ` <20041006214742.GA5180@fencepost>
[not found] ` <87mzywyeau.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family>
2004-10-08 23:47 ` Miles Bader
2004-10-09 16:04 ` Alexander Pohoyda
2004-10-09 17:12 ` Stefan
2004-10-09 18:15 ` Alexander Pohoyda
2004-10-09 18:20 ` Miles Bader
[not found] ` <878yaf61x0.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family>
2004-10-09 21:10 ` Miles Bader
2004-10-09 21:19 ` Miles Bader
2004-10-10 15:15 ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-10 22:58 ` Miles Bader
2004-10-11 16:45 ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-12 2:09 ` Miles Bader
[not found] ` <87is9gj8v5.fsf@jurta.org>
[not found] ` <20041012150351.GA24206@fencepost>
2004-10-12 16:05 ` Syncing Gnus with Emacs and back (was: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils) Reiner Steib
2004-10-13 1:26 ` Syncing Gnus with Emacs and back Miles Bader
2004-10-13 20:21 ` Reiner Steib
2004-10-13 22:51 ` Miles Bader
2004-10-14 7:47 ` Miles Bader
2004-10-09 19:02 ` [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils Stefan
2004-10-11 10:36 ` Simon Josefsson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=iluzn2t1qzw.fsf@latte.josefsson.org \
--to=jas@extundo.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).