From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/53067 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chris Uzdavinis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Gnus status Date: 09 Jun 2003 11:28:19 -0400 Organization: Automated Trading Desk, LLC Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1055172403 27438 80.91.224.249 (9 Jun 2003 15:26:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 15:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M1611@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Jun 09 17:26:35 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19POXa-00077k-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jun 2003 17:26:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19POZn-00045T-00; Mon, 09 Jun 2003 10:28:51 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19POZj-00045O-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 09 Jun 2003 10:28:47 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 20984 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2003 15:28:47 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 20979 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2003 15:28:47 -0000 Original-Received: from plover.atdesk.com (204.130.247.254) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2003 15:28:47 -0000 Original-Received: from explicit.atdesk.com (explicit.atdesk.com [172.30.40.54]) by plover.atdesk.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h59FSJm10284 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 11:28:19 -0400 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53067 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53067 Hi, I've been a happy user of Gnus 5.8.8 for a while and am considering moving up to a newer version, but I'm wondering what your thoughts are on using the latest it as a primary mail client. Do you consider it ready for "real" use, or does it still at the stage where it "occationally rains down death and destruction on innocent bystanders"? Sorry if this has been asked before, but I'm having trouble finding anything that really sums up the current state. Thanks! -- Chris