Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com>
To: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: $ collision
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:28:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jgaamb4di2.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pqv779gi.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> (Russ Allbery's message of "Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:27:09 -0700")

Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:

> Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com> writes:
>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>
>>> I recently bound `$' to `gnus-summary-mark-as-spam', but nnmairix uses
>>> this command for its keymap.
>
>>> So we either have to remove the `gnus-summary-mark-as-spam' binding, or
>>> more the nnmairix keys somewhere else.  Thoughts?
>
>> Is M-d not the standard for mark as spam? Why another binding that
>> causes conflicts?
>
> I was the one who requested that.  There are two main reasons.  First,
> marking things as spam is a very common action (at least for me, and I
> think for anyone who uses the spam filtering bits), and M-d is two
> keystrokes if one is using Emacs in an xterm, which I often do when I'm
> travelling.  Second, nearly all the other marks (!, ?, #, *, etc.) can be
> added by pressing the character for the mark, so it seemed to make sense
> for consistency.
>
> I don't really care what that one key is, although $ does seem to make the
> most sense; I mostly just wanted to have one key I could press to mark
> things as spam.

keyboard dependant I guess. $ is a shifted key for me and M-d seems
pretty instantaneous for someone using and familiar emacs.




  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-18 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-17 14:09 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-17 21:32 ` Reiner Steib
2010-10-18 18:23   ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-19 14:15     ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-10-19 18:20       ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-18  7:33 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-18 16:27   ` Russ Allbery
2010-10-18 17:28     ` Richard Riley [this message]
2010-10-18 17:33       ` Adam Sjøgren
2010-10-19  0:19       ` Russ Allbery
2010-10-19  0:49         ` Richard Riley
2010-10-19  1:05           ` Russ Allbery
2010-10-19  1:27             ` Richard Riley
2010-10-19  1:32               ` Russ Allbery
2010-10-19 10:28                 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-19 16:12             ` James Cloos
2010-10-19 18:18               ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-19 18:40             ` Andreas Schwab
2010-10-19 10:34         ` Steinar Bang
2010-10-19 10:37           ` Steinar Bang
2010-10-19 10:53             ` Richard Riley
2010-10-20  2:54               ` Russ Allbery
2010-10-20  5:17                 ` Richard Riley
2010-10-20  8:28                   ` Adam Sjøgren
2010-10-19 17:04           ` Adam Sjøgren
2010-10-18 17:47 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-10-18 18:14   ` Richard Riley
2010-10-18 18:55   ` David Engster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jgaamb4di2.fsf@news.eternal-september.org \
    --to=rileyrg@googlemail.com \
    --cc=ding@gnus.org \
    --cc=rra@stanford.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).