From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73234 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: $ collision Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:28:05 +0200 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: References: <87pqv779gi.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287422903 18940 80.91.229.12 (18 Oct 2010 17:28:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Russ Allbery Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21606@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Oct 18 19:28:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7tVR-00024G-KR for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:28:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P7tVP-0007T0-Ri; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:28:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P7tVO-0007Sl-FV for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:28:14 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P7tVK-0005Nv-5s for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:28:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P7tVJ-0003Kk-00 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:28:09 +0200 Original-Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so856431bwz.17 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:28:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :organization:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=rnDPL+uXKv75TWqA5ZDc+VcxveWp0UMutFvjgkoAQoY=; b=dflFco5MOmKMk333x12xpHkjM6GIANlwWVpHfvO/Uz4sWVVP00/Klo4/8z2n460oEN ty8ef2XyJaxNm/uHJweSZ2JOaXgQ9dS2AOs8he+LbOJSpomvg4nvTm8akCh8OlZ9W3dV qt64XdjYIrLJTDh5HLyO5zYjGuGi6h6UehDaI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=ar5IRBfnljApmfeU95UPObEz2v1OM99JCtu3kjPHbk6QgU/j3gpj8OKBnMck2BkLcY uf/2wSZXwtayRj2YCUTXfDw9RNmNgFxIbzIBFEknwFsd8RxXu8BGaA7SutfZOajvt/+H 80y8/fKstXGFH7zojiGH/iAeQprteg7Gi9pic= Original-Received: by 10.204.77.212 with SMTP id h20mr4781289bkk.33.1287422888253; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a25sm15317726bks.20.2010.10.18.10.28.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:28:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87pqv779gi.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> (Russ Allbery's message of "Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:27:09 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:73234 Archived-At: Russ Allbery writes: > Richard Riley writes: >> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > >>> I recently bound `$' to `gnus-summary-mark-as-spam', but nnmairix uses >>> this command for its keymap. > >>> So we either have to remove the `gnus-summary-mark-as-spam' binding, or >>> more the nnmairix keys somewhere else. Thoughts? > >> Is M-d not the standard for mark as spam? Why another binding that >> causes conflicts? > > I was the one who requested that. There are two main reasons. First, > marking things as spam is a very common action (at least for me, and I > think for anyone who uses the spam filtering bits), and M-d is two > keystrokes if one is using Emacs in an xterm, which I often do when I'm > travelling. Second, nearly all the other marks (!, ?, #, *, etc.) can be > added by pressing the character for the mark, so it seemed to make sense > for consistency. > > I don't really care what that one key is, although $ does seem to make the > most sense; I mostly just wanted to have one key I could press to mark > things as spam. keyboard dependant I guess. $ is a shifted key for me and M-d seems pretty instantaneous for someone using and familiar emacs.