From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4308
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: davidk@lysator.liu.se (David K}gedal)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Resending
Date: 08 Dec 1995 17:45:52 +0100
Organization: Lysator Computer Society, Link|ping University, Sweden
Sender: davidk@lysator.liu.se
Message-ID: <jp3favqzb3.fsf@tina.lysator.liu.se>
References: <jpivjvzvkq.fsf@tiny.lysator.liu.se>
	<55wx8akqtt.fsf@galil.austnsc.tandem.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145071 29120 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:17:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:17:51 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA21844 for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 09:49:18 -0800
Original-Received: from konrad.lysator.liu.se (lysnet-gw.lysator.liu.se [130.236.253.6]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <RAA23172@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 17:46:14 +0100
Original-Received: from tina.lysator.liu.se (tina.lysator.liu.se [130.236.253.14]) by konrad.lysator.liu.se (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id RAA08221; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 17:45:58 +0100
Original-Received: (davidk@localhost) by tina.lysator.liu.se (8.6.11/8.6.11) id RAA20463; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 17:45:53 +0100
X-Face: D]XdQ0Lvl](98/?#ke.70P&g#NMUCf!)RIE}'k~=+N;#R2uW:$?JwjbU*jlrOh<0}LlKrwJ
 '+U#<iQtLnEq4>I_Mg|YVK\yHGVs`<cyJs.H_rL_-qNlC@Z{.l>iy-^RoC(Sq'H3Bv*&'aL`!\Sk?[
 Y^soDZ`fP_My5y282q2T<iZe)
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: dreschs@mpd.tandem.com's message of 06 Dec 1995 12:08:46 -0600
Original-Lines: 24
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4308
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4308

dreschs@mpd.tandem.com (Sten Drescher) writes:

>	Resent-Message-ID is in RFC 822 as a reference field, and it is
>a Good Thing - for example, I use procmail/formail to save 10KB of
>Message-IDs, and drop duplicates.  The main use for this is in mailing
>lists - like right now.  If you drop duplicates, you will see this once.
>If you don't, you'll see it twice - once from me, and once from the
>list. If you bounce a message to me, without alteration, I'd want it to
>be dropped if I've already received it elsewhere.

Yes, I use Gnus to read this, so I only have to see it once, but
aren't you talking about Message-ID? Where does Resent-Message-ID come
into all this?

>Also, Resent-Sender
>is also in the RFC as an originator field, although discouraged then it
>matches Resent-From (which it would usually be in this case).

Well, I think that Gnus should at least hide this header, as it does
for Sender.

-- 
David Kågedal     Lysator Academic Computer Society       davidk@lysator.liu.se
http://www.lysator.liu.se/~davidk/                              +46-13 17 65 89