From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26061
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: davidk@lysator.liu.se (David =?iso-8859-1?q?K=E5gedal?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Signature/encryption, what's the standard ?
Date: 28 Oct 1999 13:51:13 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <jp66zrhff2.fsf@lanfear.lysator.liu.se>
References: <o97k8o9kll2.fsf@lspsun17.epfl.ch> <87n1t4ztru.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> <o973duwlpea.fsf@lspsun17.epfl.ch> <87u2nbyf4e.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> <m266zrahg0.fsf@barnowl.demon.co.uk> <87hfjbycxh.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163340 17443 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:22:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:22:20 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA27329
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 07:52:31 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAB26682;
	Thu, 28 Oct 1999 06:52:24 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 28 Oct 1999 06:52:17 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA29596
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 06:52:07 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from samantha.lysator.liu.se (root@samantha.lysator.liu.se [130.236.254.202])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA27322
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 07:51:33 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from lanfear.lysator.liu.se (lanfear.lysator.liu.se [130.236.254.81])
	by samantha.lysator.liu.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA07700;
	Thu, 28 Oct 1999 13:51:15 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from davidk@localhost)
	by lanfear.lysator.liu.se (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA25666;
	Thu, 28 Oct 1999 13:51:14 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "28 Oct 1999 12:52:58 +0200"
Original-Lines: 21
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.3
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26061
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26061

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

> Graham Murray <graham@barnowl.demon.co.uk> writes:
> 
> > Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:
> > 
> > > My apologies; after closer inspection, your messages do seem to be
> > > rfc2015 compliant.  It's just Gnus that doesn't handle
> > > multipart/signed properly.
> > 
> > Is it gnus, or Mailcrypt which does not handle it properly?
> 
> Gnus shows "application/octet-stream" attachments in Oscar's mails.  I
> shouldn't see those.

No, you should see them as application/pgp-signature.  That's how it's
declared in the mail.  But I guess you didn't want to see that
either...

-- 
David Kågedal